Atera vs Auvik
A side-by-side comparison of two security tools for small businesses.
Bottom line
Atera and Auvik score within a point of each other on SMB fit (8/10 vs 8/10), so the better choice comes down to your specific workflow, budget, and the feature details below.
At a glance
| Attribute | Atera | Auvik |
|---|---|---|
| SMB score | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Category | Security | Security |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Starting price | From $119/user/mo | — |
| Best for | Atera is an excellent fit for managed service providers (MSPs) with small teams—one to ten technicians—who need to support multiple client environments without per-device cost surprises. It also suits in-house IT generalists at small businesses (roughly 10–150 employees) who are the sole technical resource and need monitoring, patching, and a helpdesk in one place. Industries that rely on always-on endpoints—dental practices, law firms, small accounting offices, light manufacturing with networked equipment—get the most from its proactive alerting. Freelance IT consultants scaling their client base find the pricing model particularly compelling because onboarding a new client doesn't trigger a license cost increase. | Auvik fits best with small and mid-sized businesses that have at least one dedicated IT person on staff or work with a managed service provider. Professional services firms, healthcare practices, financial offices, and retail operations running 20 to 500 users across one or more locations gain the most value—particularly those that have experienced unexplained outages or whose network documentation lives in an outdated spreadsheet. MSPs managing multiple SMB clients will find the multi-tenant design especially practical. It's also a strong fit for companies preparing for compliance audits that require demonstrable network visibility and configuration management. |
Atera
Flat per-technician pricing lets small IT teams monitor and manage unlimited devices without watching costs balloon.
Picture a two-person IT shop supporting a 60-seat accounting firm: laptops running slow, a server patch overdue, and a queue of helpdesk tickets piling up across three different inboxes. That's exactly the situation Atera was built to untangle. Rather than juggling separate tools…
Key features
- Per-technician flat pricing covers unlimited monitored devices on any plan
- Real-time RMM alerts for disk health, CPU spikes, offline devices, and service failures
- Built-in remote access lets technicians connect to endpoints directly from an alert
- Automated patch management for Windows, macOS, and Linux with scheduling controls
- Integrated helpdesk ticketing with email-to-ticket, SLA tracking, and client portal
- Script library and AI-assisted script generation for routine IT automation tasks
- Third-party integrations with antivirus, backup, and billing tools via the marketplace
- Mobile app allows technicians to respond to alerts and manage tickets on the go
Limitations
The per-technician model is a double-edged sword: excellent for device-heavy environments, but if your team grows faster than your device count, costs scale quickly. The PSA module covers the basics—ticketing, time tracking, invoicing—but lacks the depth of dedicated PSA platforms if you need complex project management or advanced contract billing. Some users report that the reporting and dashboard customization options are more limited than competing RMM tools at similar price points. Integrations are expanding via the marketplace, but verify that your specific backup, security, or documentation tool is supported before switching. Customer support response times have drawn mixed reviews; verify current SLA tiers on the vendor site.
Auvik
Automatically map, monitor, and troubleshoot every device on your network before small issues become costly outages.
Picture this: it's Monday morning and your office's internet connection is crawling, two employees can't print, and nobody can tell you which switch is causing the problem. Without visibility into your network, tracking down the culprit means physically walking cables, pulling up…
Key features
- Automatic network discovery builds a live topology map within minutes of deployment
- 64 pre-built alerts cover common failure scenarios without manual configuration
- Automated device configuration backups enable fast restore after misconfigurations
- Real-time traffic analysis identifies bandwidth hogs and unusual usage patterns
- Multi-site dashboard gives centralized visibility across multiple office locations
- Multi-tenant architecture supports MSPs managing several SMB clients from one portal
- Cloud-based platform requires no on-premises management server to maintain
Limitations
Auvik's subscription cost scales with the number of billable devices, which can grow quickly once discovery counts every managed switch, router, and firewall on a larger network. Pricing is not publicly listed in detail, so SMBs should request a quote and model the device count carefully before committing. The platform is focused on network infrastructure and does not provide endpoint detection, vulnerability scanning, or help desk capabilities—you'll need complementary tools for those functions. Very small networks with minimal complexity are unlikely to see enough return to justify the cost. Some users note the initial configuration terminology assumes familiarity with networking concepts, which may require a brief ramp-up for generalist IT staff.
We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no cost to you.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Atera or Auvik better for small businesses?
- Atera and Auvik score within a point of each other on SMB fit (8/10 vs 8/10), so the better choice comes down to your specific workflow, budget, and the feature details below.
- How does pricing compare between Atera and Auvik?
- Atera offers paid plans from about $119/mo. Auvik offers a free tier or trial. Always confirm current plans on each vendor's website before you commit.
- When should I choose Atera over Auvik?
- Atera is a strong fit for Atera is an excellent fit for managed service providers (MSPs) with small teams—one to ten technicians—who need to support multiple client…. Lean toward Auvik if you need Auvik fits best with small and mid-sized businesses that have at least one dedicated IT person on staff or work with a managed service….
Read the full profiles: Atera · Auvik · All Security tools